{"id":4926,"date":"2023-08-14T12:20:14","date_gmt":"2023-08-14T17:20:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/?p=4926"},"modified":"2023-08-14T12:20:15","modified_gmt":"2023-08-14T17:20:15","slug":"cnn-gets-mocked-after-posting-a-guide-for-neopronouns-from-ae-to-ze","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/?p=4926","title":{"rendered":"CNN Gets Mocked After Posting a Guide for \u2018Neopronouns\u2019 From \u2018Ae to Ze\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\"CNN

CNN faced mounting criticism for its decision to feature an extensive 2,000-word essay posted<\/a> to its X account, dedicated to the subject of neopronouns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The network\u2019s report, \u201cA guide to neopronouns from ae to ze,\u201d detailed the use of such pronouns, with guidance on how to address someone using unconventional pronouns such as \u201cleaf.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CNN included insights from a University of Illinois professor who promoted the significance of self-identification and took readers through the fundamentals of pronouns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, it spotlighted the usage of neopronouns by nonbinary individuals and furnished readers with example sentences to demonstrate their use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After being shared on social media platforms, the article garnered significant attention, racking up over 1.4 million views.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While some users found amusement in CNN\u2019s comprehensive approach, a significant number openly criticized and questioned the news outlet\u2019s decision, casting doubt on its credibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Radio host Jason Rantz commented<\/a>, \u201cZe are not a news organization.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt\u2019s how we\u00a0knew<\/a>\u00a0there was no \u2018Trump News\u2019 for the day,\u201d Meme\u2019nOnLibs mockingly remarked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis reminds me of the fake dictionary of made up words at the back of Anthony Burgess\u2019s dystopian novel \u2018A Clockwork Orange\u2019,\u201d commented Brian Doherty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another poster mocked<\/a> CNN, saying the Babylon Bee is more trustworthy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The article notably introduced readers to \u201cnounself\u201d neopronouns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, concerns arose within the linguistic community, with one linguist expressing apprehension regarding the potential negative effects of such neopronouns on the credibility of transgender and nonbinary individuals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The idea behind neopronouns, as suggested by CNN, stems from an evolving linguistic phenomenon where new words, especially pronouns, are developed and adopted by certain groups to better reflect their identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the wider context, the debate over neopronouns and their acceptance in mainstream language continues to be a polarizing issue, with media outlets, educators and the general public taking varied stances on the matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Original Article: https:\/\/resistthemainstream.com\/cnn-gets-mocked-after-posting-a-guide-for-neopronouns\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CNN faced mounting criticism for its decision to feature an extensive 2,000-word essay posted to its X account, dedicated to the subject of neopronouns. The network\u2019s report, \u201cA guide to neopronouns from ae to ze,\u201d detailed the use of such pronouns, with guidance on how to address someone using unconventional pronouns such as \u201cleaf.\u201d CNN included insights from a University of Illinois professor who promoted the significance of self-identification and took readers through the fundamentals of pronouns. Additionally, it spotlighted the usage […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":66,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-democrats"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4926","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/66"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4926"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4926\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4927,"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4926\/revisions\/4927"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nakedpolitics.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}